Sermon presented on 4/29 based on Acts 4: 5-12.
A Sunday school teacher ended the class with this question “If I sold my house and my car, had a big garage sale, and gave all my money to the church, would that get me into heaven?” “NO!” the children all answered. The teacher then asked, “If I cleaned the church every day, mowed the yard, and kept everything neat and tidy, would that get me into heaven?” Once more they all answered, “NO!”
“Well, then, if I was kind to animals and gave candy to all the children and loved my husband or wife, would that get me into heaven?” the teacher asked them again. Again, all the children said “NO!”
“Well,” the teacher continued, thinking they were a good bit more theologically sophisticated than she had given them credit for then asked, “Then how can I get into heaven?”
A five-year-old boy shouted out, “YOU GOTTA BE DEAD!”
Other than being “DEAD” …. “what would get us into heaven” Or as Peter puts it in his brief exchange with his adversaries today recorded in Acts: “There is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among mortals by which we must be saved.” These wonderful words have been both helpful and troubling to many of us that are Christian. For whether uttered in sarcasm or sincerity, Peter’s claim is one that most Christians have at least thought about, especially when confronted by today's text in Acts or by Jesus in John: “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” (John 14:6)
What do we make of those words? Do we avoid them, or accept them wholeheartedly. Do we dismiss them or struggle to reconcile them to the truth of a loving God?
Before we get into today’s words we need to remind ourselves that Peter is not preaching in a vacuum. It is at a specific event actually right in the middle of one. You see on the previous day, Peter and John had healed a crippled beggar as they entered the temple for afternoon prayer. After the people saw the lame man walking around, “they were filled with wonder and amazement at what had happened to him.” Seeking to learn more about this marvelous deed, the people who had previously seen the man by the temple gate approached Peter and John, the alleged perpetrators of this act of mercy.
With the lame man still clinging to them and the crowd closing in, Peter asked, “You Israelites, why do you wonder at this, or why do you stare at us, as though by our own power or piety we had made him walk?” The narrator then summarizes Peter's answer to his rhetorical question. The cripple wasn't healed by the Apostles' power, but “by faith in [Jesus'] name” and by the power of God who raised Jesus from the dead.
However at this point, the religious officials had heard enough. We hear that they were “annoyed,” especially the Sadducees who did not believe in the resurrection. Consequently, they arrest Peter and John, and separate Peter and John from the crowd and their supporters and hold them until the next day when the investigation could continue. That is the point in the lesson where we enter today.
The scene is, in a sense a legal one, as both accusers and accused face off on the following day after the healing. The narrator even names three categories of accusers: “rulers, elders, and scribes.” Then with the image of a court in mind the prosecution team begins its interrogation. Drawing upon Peter's speech from the previous day, the complainants ask, “By what power or by what name did you do this?”
It probably seems odd to initiate a public examination in such a direct way. Nevertheless, rather than skirt and avoid the issue, Peter answers them straightforwardly, and in doing so furnishes sufficient evidence should they really want to condemn both him and John.
Without evasion, and according to the narrator, “being filled with the Holy Spirit,” Peter repeats in a sanctioned, but hostile, legal setting what he had said on the previous day. He and John had healed a man--- done a good deed; in contrast, the religious leaders were complicit in Jesus' death. For further support, Peter appeals to Scripture: “This Jesus is 'the stone that was rejected by you, the builders; it has become the cornerstone.” (Psalm 118:22)
Then Peter's testimony concludes with a crescendo. Not only was the crippled beggar healed “by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth,” Peter further asserts that “There is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among mortals by which we must be saved.”
There we have it, but before we continue I should add that there is some disagreement on how the biblical Greek is translated. Because the word what is translated as “saved” can also mean “rescue,” “heal,” “be made whole,” etc.,.
All the same, for centuries, faithful Christians have struggled with Peter's claim that salvation comes only through Jesus. They have asked, “What about those who've never heard the gospel? What about those who are faithful participants in other religions? What about those who had died long before Jesus lived?” And in attempts to answer those questions, over the centuries various Christians have come up with no less than six different positions, all of which are speculative. I put them in the bulletin insert with various biblical passages used by these different positions.
The first position is Restrictivism: There is no hope of salvation apart from hearing the gospel and having faith in Christ before death. The second position taken is radical pluralism: Christ is one of many ways to God. The third position is called Universalism: Salvation is through Christ, but ultimately all will be saved. Then there is a fourth position taken by some called Universal evangelization before death: God ensures that everyone who seeks God will in fact hear the gospel before they die. Another position is called Eschatological evangelization: All who did not respond in this life will receive an opportunity to respond after death. And the last is called Inclusivism: People who have never heard the gospel may obtain salvation if they respond to the light they do have. Furthermore, some Christians have mixed some of these positions, or changed over time, but those are basic six.
How, then, do we sort this out? First for me is what we can see from the event it began with a healing. Second, Peter saw this opportunity to proclaim that the grand turnaround of the resurrection not only life out of death but that the rejected stone has become the cornerstone. In other words, “the name of Jesus” is neither a magical incantation nor a slogan for intolerance regarding other religious paths. Rather Peter is proclaiming the cornerstone the way in the name of Jesus; a way of humility and self-giving, it is the way of being bold before coercive power. It is the way of laying down one’s life for others, of taking up the cross, of being a follower of Jesus. That means it is either awful irony or utter blasphemy to take this verse – extolling the healing power of the name of Jesus – and using it as a bludgeoning weapon of Christian dominion or to answer all the questions of faith.
The third point is what Christ himself said to Peter which is that the great commandment is to love God and neighbor. Because of the cross and empty tomb, God is now seen as revealed in Jesus and the neighbor as Peter learns later is all the people around us.
To love neighbor means learning to accept those who are different from us, whose political affiliations, religious systems and personal lives differ from ours. It means having lots of conversations and interactions, not just social meals. It means choosing to go outside our little cliques and meeting those whom we secretly fear.
For that reason, in summary here are some things we can say with confidence. Do I believe there is some good in the other world religions? Yes. Do I believe Christ came for all? Yes. Do I believe Christianity is a valid path to God? Absolutely.
In other words, sharing about Jesus Christ with those who live in dryness apart from him brings healing. It is not a method of trying to get others to repeat a line “in the name of Jesus” that will get them to heaven. We are about healing. We are about following Jesus Christ. It is up to us to live faithfully by the great light we have received in Jesus Christ, the Light of the World.

